Existential Threat - Who’s Really Undermining Democracy

This information is also available on my YouTube Channel at: https://youtu.be/CF5fstTcHfc    

If you prefer, you can also listen to this information on my Podcast at: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/norbert-gostischa/episodes/Existential-Threat---Whos-Really-Undermining-Democracy-e33e4vq

For years, the phrase “existential threat to democracy” has been lobbed like a political grenade—most often aimed at Donald Trump. But as the truth slowly peels away from the polished surfaces of press conferences and campaign slogans, Americans are beginning to ask an uncomfortable but essential question:

What if the real existential threat didn’t come from Trump—but from those who knowingly installed a president who couldn’t fully perform the job?

It’s no longer a fringe concern or the murmurings of internet forums. It’s front and center, thanks to a flurry of leaks, behind-the-scenes accounts, and the growing realization among ordinary citizens that something never quite added up during the Biden presidency.

So let’s break it all down.

What Is an “Existential Threat,” Really?

The term means a threat so serious it could undo the very existence of something—be it a nation, institution, or system of governance. Politicians love to use it, especially when they want to sound the alarm about their opponents:

Democrats have said Trump threatened democracy through his words, tweets, and post-election challenges.

But now, many are wondering if the Democratic Party itself played a role in endangering the republic by backing a man they knew was in cognitive decline.

The Shadow Presidency - Just a Theory, or a Democratic Crisis?

The idea of a “shadow presidency” may sound like a political thriller plot, but it raises legitimate questions:

Was Biden truly making the decisions?

Who was running the country behind the scenes?

Was the American public deliberately misled during the election—and throughout his presidency?

These aren’t just speculative musings anymore. Former staffers, reporters, and global leaders have raised quiet concerns. His limited press exposure, frequent gaffes, and signs of cognitive slippage weren’t hidden—they were managed.

And if those around him were actually the ones shaping domestic and foreign policy while shielding him from scrutiny, then we weren’t living under a presidency—we were living under a performance.

When the Obvious Is Labeled “Conspiracy”

Here’s where it gets infuriating for many Americans:

Despite what seems obvious to anyone watching—President Biden’s fading faculties—mainstream media and political elites have consistently dismissed it as “a right-wing conspiracy theory.”

But let’s remember something - not every so-called conspiracy theory is false.

Watergate was labeled a conspiracy theory - until Nixon resigned.

The Tuskegee Experiment was labeled a conspiracy theory - until it was publicly admitted.

The CIA’s MK-Ultra program sounded like science fiction - until declassified documents confirmed it.

So when ordinary citizens say, “I don’t think Biden’s actually in charge,” they’re not peddling nonsense. They’re asking the right questions—questions the media should have been asking all along.

The term “conspiracy theory” is now too often a tool used not to protect truth, but to suppress it.

Gatekeepers and Narrative Control

Why does this happen? Because of the gatekeeping structure built into our political and media systems.

Legacy media outlets curate what’s considered “newsworthy.”

Big Tech platforms control what’s amplified—and what’s censored.

Party operatives and handlers carefully manage public perception.

This isn’t some grand Illuminati scheme—it’s the modern public relations machine at full tilt. If admitting the president is mentally unfit would harm the party or change electoral outcomes, then the solution (for them) is simple: deny, deflect, and discredit.

Even when the “handwriting is on the wall,” as many Americans now see, the system still clings to denial because acknowledging the truth would be too destabilizing.

So Who's the Real Existential Threat?

Let’s revisit that term.

If the core of democracy is trust in the vote and the leaders it produces, then:

Promoting a candidate not fit to serve, Shielding that fact from the public, and Allowing unelected aides to govern in the shadows - is a far greater existential threat than inflammatory tweets or loud rallies.

Because if the people’s choice is an illusion, we are not living in a democracy, we’re living in a managed democracy, one where perception overrides reality.

We Don’t Need Permission to See What’s Obvious

There’s a quiet revolution happening—not with torches and pitchforks, but with ordinary people daring to trust their instincts. They're no longer waiting for "credible journalists" or "approved experts" to confirm what their own eyes and ears are telling them.

Millions watched Biden struggle through speeches, avoid spontaneous interviews, and appear more as a symbol than a leader. They were told to look away, that everything was fine, that questions were dangerous.

But now those same people are being proven right. And they’re not asking for apologies—they’re asking for accountability.

Conclusion: The True Cost of Political Deception

If there's one takeaway here, it’s this:

👉 Truth does not require permission.

Whether the label is "existential threat" or "conspiracy theory," the facts remain - a democracy without transparency isn’t a democracy at all.

And if those who installed, enabled, or concealed Biden’s incapacity did so knowingly, then they, not Trump, are the ones who endangered the very fabric of American governance.

Stay safe, stay secure and maybe it’s time to stop gaslighting the public and start confronting reality—with courage, honesty, and consequences.

(AI was used to aid in the creation of this article.)

"I'll see you again soon. Bye-bye and thanks for reading, watching, and listening.👋"